Understanding the Key Steps in Order Fulfillment: Pick, Pack, Ship, Returns
7 October 2025
10 Most Critical Skills for Logistics Managers in the AI Era
7 October 2025
FLEX. Logistics
We provide logistics services to online retailers in Europe: Amazon FBA prep, processing FBA removal orders, forwarding to Fulfillment Centers - both FBA and Vendor shipments.
Introduction
Blockchain isn’t just for cryptocurrencies. Over the past few years, increasing attention has shifted to how distributed ledger technologies (DLT) can address long‑standing challenges in logistics: lack of transparency, counterfeit goods, inefficiencies in document handling, poor tracking, compliance burdens, and trust issues among supply chain actors. Particularly as supply chains grow more global, more multi‑party, more constrained by regulatory and sustainability demands, the value propositions of blockchain have become very compelling.
This article explores eight concrete use cases where blockchain is being applied or piloted in logistics, what benefits have been observed or expected, some real‑world examples, and what the trade‑offs and challenges are. By knowing these, logistics professionals can better assess which blockchain solutions may make sense for their operations, where to pilot first, and what to watch out for.
1. Paperless and Electronic Bills of Lading (e B/L)
What the Use Case Is
Bills of lading are fundamental legal documents in international shipping. They define ownership, receipt of goods, contract terms, and are often negotiable. Traditional B/Ls tend to be paper‑based, which causes delays, fraud risk, lost documents, and high administrative cost.
Blockchain enables a secure, immutable, and shared electronic bill of lading (e‑B/L). Parties (shipper, carrier, consignee, banks, customs) can issue, endorse, transfer, and accept documents in digital form with cryptographic verification, removing dependency on courier or physical signature.
Real‑World Example
- PIL & IBM: Pacific International Lines (Singapore) carried out a pilot with IBM for an electronic Bill of Lading tracking mandarins from China. The pilot drastically reduced the time to transfer title deeds (traditional process of 5‑7 days) to almost instantaneous digital transfer.
- ZIM + Wave + Sparx Logistics: ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and Wave Ltd, in cooperation with Sparx, successfully completed a paperless bills‑of‑lading pilots. Containers shipped from China to Canada carried e‑B/L. All participants issued, transferred, and received original documents via the Wave blockchain application.
- Israel Ports Company also tested e‑B/L blockchain systems in port community systems to speed up cargo release and reduce forgery or misfiled documents.
Benefits Observed
- Dramatic reduction in document processing time (manual signatures, courier, verification)
- Reduced risk of lost or stolen or forged documents
- Lower administrative and cut‑&‑paste errors
- Improved trust among stakeholders since the digital version is shared, with audit trail
Challenges & Considerations
- Legal recognition: Some jurisdictions still require physical B/Ls, or do not accept digital signatures or documents as equivalent to paper.
- Integration with banks or customs: Many finance transactions rely on original documents; systems must connect with financial institutions.
- Interoperability: Different blockchain platforms or standards could hamper adoption across different shipping lines, carriers, ports.
- Security & privacy: Ensuring only authorized parties see needed data, while maintaining tamper‑proof nature.
2. Supply Chain Traceability and Provenance
What the Use Case Is
Traceability means knowing where each component / raw material / good was sourced, processed, and how it moved through the chain. Provenance is similar: verifying origin, environmental credentials, ethical standards, etc. For consumers concerned about sustainability, conflict minerals, food safety or “origin stories” this is increasingly important.
Real‑World Example
- Mercedes‑Benz & Circulor: They are tracking sourcing of critical materials like cobalt using blockchain to ensure ethical sourcing and to record CO₂ emissions of supply of materials.
- Lavazza (coffee company): Lavazza used blockchain with xFarm platform to ensure sustainable agriculture supply chain reporting from farms to consumer, enabling transparency of environmental and social practices among actors (farmers, processors).
- Textile and Clothing Industry: A paper (“Blockchain‑based framework for supply chain traceability: A case example of textile and clothing industry”) outlines how blockchain can help multi‑tier production and ensure visibility and quality assurance in a complicated textile supply chain.
Benefits Observed
- Enhanced consumer trust: when shoppers scan codes or check provenance, they see real, verifiable data.
- Better compliance with regulatory standards for sustainability, conflict‑free sourcing, human rights etc.
- More accurate recalls: e.g. in food or consumer products, knowing exactly which batches are affected speeds response.
- Reduced waste: unverified suppliers or bad practices are exposed, enabling better supplier selection and audit.
Challenges & Considerations
- Data quality at origin: upstream data must be accurate and honest; if not, blockchain becomes just an auditable ledger of bad data.
- Cost for small suppliers: implementing recording, sensors, data capture may be expensive or technically challenging.
Scalability: as number of records, participants, batches grows, managing data size, speed of queries, performance becomes an issue. (Some academic work on efficiency in blockchain traceability address this.)
3. Port and Terminal Operations: Container Release & Authorization
What the Use Case Is
One of the friction points in shipping is the process of container pick‑ups: verifying which freight forwarder or driver is authorized to pickup containers, processing paperwork, verifying identity, preventing fraud, handling PIN / authorization systems etc. Blockchain can help make container release safer, more auditable, and faster by using tokens or cryptographic identifiers rather than insecure PINs, multiple intermediaries or paper records.
Real‑World Example
- Port of Rotterdam pilot: The port is implementing a blockchain‑based system to automate and secure container release. Instead of the usual PIN code system (which is vulnerable to copying, fraud, intermediaries), a cryptographic token is used and recorded on a ledger visible by all parties (port authority, shipping company, freight forwarder, driver) for authorization.
Benefits Observed
- Reduced delays in pickup due to lost or miscommunicated authorization codes
- Reduced fraud and errors in container release
- Improved coordination between multiple parties (freight forwarders, port authorities, carriers) because all see the same record of authorization
Challenges & Considerations
- Getting many stakeholders to adopt the token system (drivers, forwarders, port authorities, terminals) is difficult.
- Security of identity: verifying drivers, ensuring tokens aren’t misused.
- Integration with existing port community systems, legacy IT, security protocols.
- Scalability and handling many container moves daily without performance or cost blowups.
4. Food Safety and Recall Management
What the Use Case Is
In food supply chains, when contamination or spoilage happens, knowing where an affected batch came from, where it was stored, which farms produced the ingredient, etc., is crucial. Traditional paper logs may be slow, incomplete, or lost. Blockchain helps by providing an immutable, timestamped record of each step: planting, harvesting, processing, shipping, retailer storage, etc.
Real‑World Example
- Walmart & IBM Food Trust: Walmart uses a blockchain‑based platform to trace produce and other food items. It significantly reduces trace time in case of recalls. For example, tracing the origin of certain leafy greens might take seconds instead of days/weeks.
Benefits Observed
- Faster response to recalls, reducing risk to consumers, reducing cost of delistings & wasted product.
- Improved transparency boosts trust among suppliers and consumers.
- Lower regulatory risk, better auditability, possibly fewer penalties in case of food safety issues.
Challenges & Considerations
- Need for consistent tracking across all supply chain actors: farms, processing, storage, transport. If any segment doesn’t record or doesn’t share data, chain breaks.
- Cost and complexity of traceability systems, especially in less developed regions.
- Data privacy when farms or individual growers may not want to expose internal data.
5. Counterfeit Prevention & Anti Fraud
What the Use Case Is
Counterfeit or adulterated goods are a big problem in many sectors: pharmaceuticals, luxury goods, electronics, even spare parts. Consumers are harmed, brands suffer reputation damage, legality & regulatory compliance suffers. Blockchain helps by enabling product authentication: each item has a digital identity (via QR/RFID/NFC) tied to a chain of custody that is difficult to forge.
Real‑World Example
- De Beers: tracks diamonds (Tracr platform) to ensure ethical sourcing and to allow customers to confirm that diamonds are not conflict diamonds.
- Pharmaceutical sector: Projects like MediLedger are using blockchain to ensure that drugs are verified, batches are genuine and traceable. (Mentioned in provider overviews in Pirex Solutions etc.)
Benefits Observed
- Reduction in counterfeit goods entering supply chain
- Enhanced trust and brand protection
- Possibly reduced insurance or legal costs from counterfeit risks or fraud
Challenges & Considerations
- Requires customer or enforcement authority buy‑in (i.e. consumers or regulators need to use verification)
- Cost of tagging and tracking each unit or batch, especially low margin items
- Ensuring that physical product / tag remains tamper‑protected; risk of tag substitution or tampering still exists if physical security is lax
6. Automated Settlements, Smart Contracts & Invoice Reconciliation
What the Use Case Is
Smart contracts on blockchain allow certain conditions to be coded so that when certain events occur (goods delivered, documents verified), payments or settlements are triggered automatically. Also, invoice reconciliation across multiple parties can be automated via shared ledger, reducing disputes.
Real‑World Example
While fewer large public pilots have been fully documented, many platforms integrating blockchain + logistics (TradeLens, etc.) aim to reduce paperwork and error, which indirectly affects settlements. Also Pirex Solutions and other firms mention such use cases as part of cost‑savings realized.
Benefits Observed
- Faster payments, fewer disputes over missing documentation or delayed approvals
- Reduced human error and administrative burden
- Better cash flow for suppliers and carriers
Challenges & Considerations
- Legal enforceability of smart contracts depends on jurisdiction
- Coding all the contract conditions, ensuring they align with real business conditions (edge cases, exceptions)
- Need for trust that external events/data (deliveries, delay notifications, inspection certificates etc.) that trigger the contract are accurate
7. Regulatory Compliance, Auditability & Supply Chain Transparency for Sustainability
What the Use Case Is
Regulations around sustainability, conflict minerals, emissions, environmental impact, labor practices, require companies to track, audit, and report chain of custody back through many tiers of suppliers. Blockchain can be used to create auditable, tamper‑proof records to facilitate this, reduce compliance cost, and allow proof to stakeholders or regulators.
Real‑World Example
- The study “Blockchain for compliance: an information processing case study of mandatory supply chain transparency in conflict minerals sourcing.” This shows that blockchain architecture helps with information uncertainty and equivocality in regulations concerning conflict minerals.
- Lavazza’s use of blockchain + xFarm provides visibility and disclosure of sustainable practices across farms to consumer supply chain actors.
Benefits Observed
- Easier compliance with laws/regulations in different jurisdictions
- Reduced cost of audits (manual checks reduced, fewer disputes)
- Improved reputation with consumers and regulators; ability to provide proof for claims of sustainability, ethical sourcing
Challenges & Considerations
- Regulatory variation: what is required in one country may differ wildly in another
- Overspecification / overengineering: some compliance reporting may be burdensome, leading to redundant data
- Upstream supplier engagement is often weak; ensuring that all tiers of suppliers (especially raw materials) furnish accurate data is difficult
8. Visibility & Real Time Tracking Across Multi Party Global Shipments
What the Use Case Is
Tracking where shipments are, in what condition, in transit, at ports, warehouses — often multiple carriers and handlers are involved. Blockchain can help by providing a shared ledger where each party logs events (pickup, handover, customs, port arrival, loading, unloading), and authorized stakeholders can see status, delays, or discrepancies.
Real‑World Example
- Maersk & IBM – TradeLens: This platform uses blockchain to bring multiple parties (shippers, ports, carriers, customs authorities) together. The idea is to digitize shipping logs, container status, voyage data etc., enabling better visibility, fewer delays from missing paperwork, miscommunication, etc.
- Port of Rotterdam pilot, for example in container release and handling, ensures all parties involved in container processing have access to the same ledger of who has done what.
Benefits Observed
- Better predictability: stakeholders know where delays are, can intervene earlier
- Reduced disputes over what happened and when (claims, insurance, delays)
- Improved service level: customers can get more accurate ETAs, better notification of delays
Challenges & Considerations
- Data volume and timeliness: many events must be recorded; if they are delayed or not recorded accurately, visibility suffers
- Ensuring that parties actually participate — carriers and handlers often are fragmented, with varying capabilities
- Privacy concerns: not all stakeholders want all data to be visible (e.g. cost data, commercial relationships)
Key Takeaways & Practical Suggestions
From reviewing these use cases, certain patterns of success and practical decisions emerge. Here are what to look for and what to do if considering blockchain in logistics:
- Start with a specific pilot that addresses a real pain point — choose e‑B/L, traceability, container release, or another use case where document delays, fraud, visibility gaps are costly.
- Engage all stakeholders early — shippers, carriers, ports, customs, finance, suppliers. Blockchain’s value lies in shared trust and shared data; missing participants drastically reduce benefit.
- Focus on interoperability and standards — because blockchain ecosystems are fragmented, using platforms that align with industry standards (e.g. Nautical‑oriented, shipping consortia, etc.) helps with scaling.
- Ensure legal / regulatory alignment — verify that documents you digitize are legally accepted, signatures are recognized, data privacy compliance, trade law compliance.
- Consider data privacy vs transparency trade‑offs — some data is commercially sensitive; use permissions, private blockchains, or privacy preserving techniques (e.g. zero knowledge proofs) to protect that. For example, academic frameworks like PrivChain address privacy while retaining provenance.
- Measure ROI clearly — time saved, error/rework reduction, fraud reduction, claims/insurance costs, customer satisfaction improvements. Confirm regularly whether blockchain is delivering net benefit vs cost (infrastructure, training, ongoing maintenance).
Conclusion
Blockchain offers compelling possibilities in logistics: transforming how documents are handled (especially bills of lading), enabling deep provenance and traceability, improving container movements and port operations, bolstering counterfeit prevention, helping with regulatory compliance and sustainability, and giving all stakeholders much better visibility.
But it is not a silver bullet. Successful implementations depend on stakeholder collaboration, legal recognition, data quality, infrastructure readiness, and cost vs benefit trade‑offs. Organizations that go into blockchain projects should plan carefully, pilot early, ensure legal and standards alignment, and focus on real pain points. For many logistics operations, the opportunities are real — and increasingly proven.
Adopting blockchain thoughtfully can convert fragile, opaque, and costly logistics systems into more transparent, efficient, secure, and sustainable ones. As global trade and consumer expectations evolve, who acts sooner may gain meaningful competitive advantage.
