Top 7 Compliance Issues Facing Non-EU Sellers
15 March 2026
Top 5 Fuel Surcharge Drivers in European Freight Markets
15 March 2026
FLEX. Logistics
We provide logistics services to online retailers in Europe: Amazon FBA prep, processing FBA removal orders, forwarding to Fulfillment Centers - both FBA and Vendor shipments.
Sustainable packaging in European logistics is no longer a brand positioning choice — it is an increasingly regulated operational requirement. The EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR), adopted in 2024 and entering application from 2030 with transitional provisions beginning earlier, establishes mandatory recyclability requirements, minimum recycled content thresholds, and packaging minimisation obligations that apply to every packaging unit placed on the EU market regardless of the seller's country of establishment. Extended Producer Responsibility schemes in Germany, France, Austria, and other member states already impose registration, reporting, and fee obligations on any seller whose packaged products reach European consumers — obligations that the PPWR will tighten further as its implementation timeline progresses.
For Amazon FBA sellers and cross-border e-commerce operators, sustainable packaging trends in European logistics translate into two simultaneous pressures: the regulatory compliance pressure of meeting EU packaging law requirements before enforcement applies, and the operational pressure of adopting packaging materials and formats that Amazon's own sustainability programmes — Frustration-Free Packaging (FFP) and Ships in Own Container (SIOC) — increasingly reward with fee reductions and listing benefits. The seven trends described in this guide span both pressures, covering the regulatory changes that define the compliance floor and the operational innovations that best-practice EU logistics operators are already implementing above that floor.
1. EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation: Mandatory Recyclability and Minimum Recycled Content
The EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) — Regulation (EU) 2025/40, which replaces the 1994 Packaging Directive — introduces mandatory recyclability requirements that all packaging placed on the EU market must meet by 2030, with intermediate milestones from 2027. Under the PPWR, packaging must be designed to be recyclable at scale: not theoretically recyclable in laboratory conditions, but practically recyclable through the collection and sorting infrastructure that EU member states actually operate. Packaging formats that are technically recyclable but are not collected, sorted, or recycled in practice — certain multilayer laminates, coated papers that contaminate paper recycling streams, and plastic foams without established recycling pathways — will not satisfy the PPWR's recyclable-at-scale standard and must be phased out or redesigned.
The PPWR also introduces minimum recycled content requirements for plastic packaging: from 2030, plastic packaging must contain a minimum percentage of post-consumer recycled content that varies by packaging category — 30 percent for contact-sensitive plastic packaging, 35 percent for non-contact plastic packaging, and 65 percent for single-use plastic beverage bottles. For Amazon FBA sellers who use plastic poly bags, plastic void fill, and plastic cushioning in their FBA prep packaging, these recycled content requirements will increase the material cost of compliant packaging above the cost of virgin plastic alternatives currently in use. PPWR-compliant packaging material sourcing for EU fulfillment operations sources and stocks FBA prep packaging materials that meet PPWR recyclability and recycled content requirements — including FSC-certified paper-based void fill, recycled-content poly bags at the PPWR minimum thresholds, and plastic-free cushioning alternatives that satisfy both Amazon's FFP packaging requirements and the PPWR's recyclable-at-scale standard for packaging placed on the EU market.
2. Packaging Minimisation: The Shift Away from Over-Packaging in E-Commerce Fulfillment
The PPWR introduces a packaging minimisation obligation — the requirement that packaging volume and weight be reduced to the minimum necessary to protect the product and meet hygiene, safety, and consumer acceptance requirements. This is a legally enforceable version of the principle that Amazon's Frustration-Free Packaging programme has been pursuing commercially: eliminating the excessive void space, unnecessary secondary packaging layers, and oversized outer cartons that e-commerce fulfillment has historically used to protect products during transport rather than optimising for the minimum packaging weight and volume that adequate protection actually requires.
The operational implication of packaging minimisation for FBA prep is a shift from standard box sizes selected from a fixed inventory toward right-sized packaging that matches the product's dimensions more closely — reducing the void fill required to prevent product movement, lowering the dimensional weight that carriers charge for oversized packages, and reducing the packaging material cost per unit. Right-sizing technology — either manual dimensional scanning at the prep station or automated dimensioning systems that select the optimal box size from a range of available formats — reduces average packaging material use by 15 to 30 percent per unit compared to standard box inventories where packers select from a limited size range. Right-sizing packaging technology for FBA prep minimisation implements dimensional scanning at the prep station for every outbound unit — selecting the minimum adequate box size from the available range, calculating the void fill volume required for that box-product combination, and recording the packaging decision data that PPWR packaging minimisation compliance documentation requires for reporting to EPR authorities.
3. Paper-Based and Fibre-Based Packaging Replacing Plastic in Transit and Void Fill
The substitution of paper-based and fibre-based packaging materials for plastic transit packaging and void fill is the most visible operational trend in EU e-commerce logistics — driven simultaneously by PPWR recyclability requirements, EPR fee structures that charge higher fees for plastic packaging than for paper, consumer preference for unboxing experiences without plastic waste, and Amazon's FFP programme incentives that reward packaging reduction and material substitution with fee savings. Paper void fill — crinkle paper, honeycomb paper wrap, and paper cushioning systems — has replaced plastic bubble wrap and foam peanuts as the standard void fill material in most EU-compliant fulfillment operations, and paper-based mailer bags are replacing plastic polybags for soft goods categories where the product's nature allows the substitution without damage risk.
The operational considerations for paper-based material substitution in FBA prep are not purely environmental: paper void fill has different compressibility and protection characteristics than plastic bubble wrap — it performs well for light and medium products but may under-protect heavy items with sharp edges that punch through paper cushioning under shipping compression loads. The substitution decision must be made product-by-product rather than as a blanket material policy, with damage rate monitoring after substitution to verify that protection performance meets the product's damage rate threshold before the substitution is confirmed across the full volume. Paper-based packaging material performance monitoring in FBA prep tracks damage rates by packaging material type and product category across the fulfillment operation — comparing the damage rates of paper-based and plastic alternatives for each product category and flagging categories where paper substitution generates damage rates above the threshold that Amazon's return rate metrics define as acceptable, directing those categories back to protective plastic alternatives pending a product-specific packaging redesign that achieves both sustainability and protection objectives.
4. Amazon Frustration-Free Packaging and SIOC Certification: The Commercial Sustainability Incentive
Amazon's Frustration-Free Packaging (FFP) and Ships in Own Container (SIOC) programmes provide direct commercial incentives for sustainable packaging adoption: products certified to FFP or SIOC standards receive reduced FBA fulfillment fees, avoid the additional packaging that Amazon applies to non-compliant products in its fulfillment centers (saving the material and labour cost of Amazon's over-boxing), and benefit from the algorithm visibility that Amazon provides to environmentally certified products on its EU marketplaces. FFP Level 1 (ISTA 6-Amazon.com protocol compliant, 100 percent recyclable materials, no need for additional Amazon packaging) provides a fee reduction of EUR 0.05 per unit on standard-size products — a saving that adds up to EUR 25,000 annually at 500,000 units.
The certification process for FFP and SIOC requires packaging testing to Amazon's ISTA 6 drop and vibration protocol at an Amazon-approved testing laboratory, submission of test reports and packaging specifications to Amazon's Packaging Certification portal, and labelling that identifies the product as FFP or SIOC certified. The testing and certification cost per ASIN is typically EUR 800 to EUR 2,000 depending on the testing laboratory and product complexity — a cost that is recovered within 2 to 8 weeks at the fee reduction rates for products selling above 500 units per month. Amazon FFP and SIOC certification support for EU FBA sellers supports FBA sellers through the FFP and SIOC certification process — advising on packaging redesign to meet the ISTA 6 protocol requirements, coordinating testing laboratory submission, and managing the Amazon Packaging Certification portal submission that activates the fee reduction for certified ASINs.
5. Digital Product Passports and Packaging Traceability Under the EU's Digital Labelling Framework
The EU's Digital Product Passport (DPP) initiative — part of the EU Sustainable Products Regulation and the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) — will require products in specified categories to carry a data carrier (QR code, RFID, or barcode) linking to a standardised digital record that includes the product's material composition, recycled content percentage, repairability information, and end-of-life disposal instructions. The DPP requirement enters application for specific product categories on a staggered timeline from 2026: batteries and accumulators first (some provisions already in force under the EU Battery Regulation), followed by textiles, electronics, furniture, and construction products in subsequent regulatory cycles.
For Amazon FBA sellers in affected categories, the DPP requirement means that packaging must incorporate the data carrier that links to the compliant DPP record — a labelling and data management requirement that adds to the product's documentation obligations alongside GPSR responsible person labelling and CE marking. The DPP record must be maintained and accessible throughout the product's lifetime on the EU market, and the data carrier on the packaging must be scannable and functional at the point of consumer purchase and at end of life. Digital Product Passport data carrier integration in FBA prep labelling integrates DPP data carrier application into the FBA prep labelling workflow for product categories entering DPP scope — applying the QR code or RFID label that links to the seller's DPP record during the prep process, verifying data carrier readability before forwarding to Amazon, and maintaining the label application records that DPP compliance documentation requires for the product categories where DPP obligations are active.
6. Reusable Packaging Systems in B2B and Returns Logistics
The PPWR introduces reusability targets for specific packaging categories and requires that certain packaging formats offered to consumers be made available in reusable alternatives from 2030. In the logistics context, reusable packaging systems — reusable transit containers, reusable mailers, and pooled pallet and crate systems — are gaining traction in B2B supply chain segments where the closed loop between shipper and recipient makes reusable packaging economically viable without the consumer collection infrastructure that B2C reusable packaging requires. In the 3PL and FBA prep context, reusable packaging is most practically applicable in the inbound transit from supplier to 3PL — where collapsible reusable containers (CRCs) replace single-use cardboard cartons on high-frequency, high-volume supply lanes between a fixed supplier and a fixed 3PL location.
The economics of reusable transit packaging in B2B logistics depend on three variables: the cost differential between reusable containers and single-use alternatives per trip, the number of trips over which the reusable container's capital cost is amortised, and the logistics cost of the return journey for the empty containers. On high-frequency inbound lanes — a Chinese supplier shipping to a German 3PL monthly, for example — the break-even for reusable CRCs against single-use cartons typically occurs at 12 to 18 return trips, after which the reusable system generates a net cost saving per unit that compounds with volume. The EPR fee saving from replacing single-use cartons with reusable containers — because the reusable container is not placed on the EU market as packaging waste on each use — provides an additional financial benefit that reduces the break-even trip count. Reusable transit container economics for high-frequency inbound supply lanes calculates the break-even analysis for reusable container adoption on specific inbound supply lanes — comparing the capital cost of the reusable container fleet, the per-trip logistics cost of container return, and the EPR fee saving from packaging waste elimination against the single-use carton cost per trip — and implementing the container management system that tracks reusable container location and return scheduling across the supplier-to-3PL supply loop.
7. EPR Fee Optimisation Through Packaging Weight and Material Reporting Accuracy
Extended Producer Responsibility fees in Germany (VerpackG/LUCID), France (CITEO), Austria, and other EU member states are calculated on the weight and material composition of packaging placed on the market — with fee rates that vary by material type (plastic, paper, glass, metal, composites) and, in Germany, by whether the packaging is placed in the residential waste stream (dualer System) or the commercial/industrial waste stream. The financial magnitude of EPR fees for high-volume e-commerce sellers is material: a seller placing 500,000 packaged units on the German market annually with an average packaging weight of 150 grams per unit is reporting 75 tonnes of packaging to LUCID — at current fee rates of approximately EUR 1.20 to EUR 2.80 per kilogram for plastic and EUR 0.15 to EUR 0.35 per kilogram for paper, the annual EPR fee ranges from EUR 11,250 to EUR 210,000 depending on the material mix.
EPR fee optimisation is therefore a significant financial lever for sellers with high packaging volumes — and the optimisation opportunity lies primarily in accurate material-level reporting rather than over-declaring packaging weight in round numbers or misclassifying material categories in ways that apply higher fee rates than the actual packaging composition warrants. Common reporting errors that generate excess EPR fees include: reporting total packaging weight without deducting the weight of packaging components that qualify as exempt (packaging used exclusively in B2B transactions that do not enter the residential waste stream), applying plastic fee rates to composite packaging that is predominantly paper by weight and therefore correctly classified under the lower paper rate, and reporting packaging dimensions from product specifications rather than from actual shipment weights that reflect the prep packaging applied at the 3PL. EPR packaging weight and material reporting accuracy for LUCID and CITEO records the actual packaging material weight and composition for every FBA prep operation — capturing the paper, plastic, and composite components of the FBA prep packaging applied to each shipment, generating the material-level packaging report that LUCID and CITEO submissions require, and identifying the classification and exemption opportunities that reduce EPR fees to the minimum legally required without underreporting that generates penalty exposure.
In European Logistics, Sustainable Packaging Is Becoming Both a Compliance Requirement and a Cost Advantage
The seven sustainable packaging trends in European logistics — PPWR recyclability and recycled content requirements, packaging minimisation obligations, paper-based material substitution, Amazon FFP and SIOC certification, Digital Product Passports, reusable packaging systems, and EPR fee optimisation — represent both a compliance floor that EU law is progressively raising and a commercial opportunity that best-practice logistics operators are already capturing through fee reductions, EPR savings, and the competitive positioning that sustainability credentials provide on EU marketplaces where consumer and platform sustainability signals are increasingly influential. Sellers who implement sustainable packaging as a proactive operational choice rather than a reactive compliance response capture both the financial benefits and the competitive advantages ahead of the regulatory deadlines that will make the same changes mandatory for all operators.
FLEX Logistics provides sustainable packaging implementation for EU fulfillment operations: PPWR-compliant packaging material sourcing, right-sizing technology at the prep station, FFP and SIOC certification support, DPP data carrier labelling integration, and the EPR fee reporting accuracy that converts precise material tracking into the minimum legally required fee rather than the over-declared estimate that imprecise reporting generates — the operational packaging infrastructure that makes EU sustainable packaging requirements a managed compliance programme rather than an uncosted regulatory risk.
Located in the center of Europe, FLEX Logistics provides sustainable packaging implementation, PPWR-compliant FBA prep materials, FFP certification support, and EPR fee reporting for Amazon sellers managing EU packaging regulations in Germany, France, and across the EU.
Get in touch for a free quote and assessment tailored to your EU sustainable packaging and fulfillment requirements.
