Rising carrier surcharges in 2026 — what EU Amazon sellers must do now
11 March 2026
China’s export surge in early 2026 — customs clearance challenges for EU importers
11 March 2026
FLEX. Logistics
We provide logistics services to online retailers in Europe: Amazon FBA prep, processing FBA removal orders, forwarding to Fulfillment Centers - both FBA and Vendor shipments.
The US Senate bill tightening importer-of-record requirements for low-value shipments is not primarily a story about American e-commerce regulation. It is an early indicator of a global regulatory consensus that is forming around the de minimis exemption — the customs threshold below which imported goods are admitted duty-free and with minimal documentation — and that is moving toward restriction or elimination in multiple major markets simultaneously. The European Union is under the same pressure from the same direction: Chinese marketplace sellers using Temu, Shein, and direct-to-consumer shipping models have exploited the EU's EUR 150 de minimis threshold at a scale that the European Commission's own data confirms has created a distortion worth billions of euros annually in avoided import duties and VAT that EU-established sellers pay on every unit they import.
For Amazon sellers importing goods into Germany and France through a licensed 3PL or customs broker, the de minimis crackdown is not a threat to their existing import model — it is a competitive rebalancing that their compliant import structure already anticipates. But the regulatory changes coming to EU customs clearance procedures will add complexity, documentation requirements, and compliance costs to the import process that sellers whose current workflows were designed around the simplest possible customs entry need to understand before the changes are implemented rather than after their first non-compliant shipment is held at the German border.
This article connects the US regulatory signal to the EU trajectory: what the EU de minimis framework currently allows, where the European Commission's reform proposals are heading, which import models are most exposed to tightening enforcement, and how structuring your EU import flows through a licensed German customs broker and 3PL partner now provides the compliance architecture that the incoming regulatory environment will require — making the structural investment in compliant import infrastructure a preparation for what is coming rather than a reaction to it after the fact.
How the EU De Minimis Exemption Works and Why It Is Under Pressure
The EU de minimis exemption allows goods with a customs value of EUR 150 or below to be imported into EU member states without payment of customs duty — the duty relief threshold established by EU Customs Code Article 23. Separately, a VAT exemption historically applied to consignments valued below EUR 22, but this was abolished on 1 July 2021 as part of the EU VAT e-commerce package that introduced OSS and the Import One Stop Shop (IOSS). Since July 2021, all consignments entering the EU regardless of value are subject to VAT at the point of importation or through IOSS at the point of sale — meaning the VAT exemption has already been closed, but the customs duty exemption at EUR 150 remains.
The EUR 150 customs duty de minimis threshold has become the mechanism through which Chinese marketplace platforms — Temu, Shein, AliExpress, and TikTok Shop — ship individual consumer orders directly from Chinese warehouses to European consumers without paying import duties on goods that would attract 6 to 12 percent customs duty if imported in commercial quantities. A Temu order of EUR 140 worth of clothing items enters Germany duty-free under the de minimis threshold; the same clothing imported by an EU-established fashion retailer in a commercial shipment pays the applicable import duty rate plus import VAT — creating a structural cost disadvantage for EU-compliant importers that the European Commission's 2023 and 2024 customs reform proposals explicitly identified as a market distortion requiring legislative correction. Understanding customs duty cost structures in EU import operations quantifies the duty differential between de minimis direct-from-China shipping and commercial import through a licensed EU customs broker — providing the data that confirms whether the de minimis closure will affect your specific product category and duty rate exposure or whether your import model is already structured to absorb the regulatory change without material cost increase.
The US Signal: What the Importer-of-Record Bill Means for EU Policy Trajectory
The US Senate bill targeting de minimis reform tightens importer-of-record (IOR) requirements for low-value shipments — requiring that a US-established entity assumes legal responsibility for the customs declaration, product compliance, and duty liability of de minimis shipments rather than the current model where Chinese sellers ship directly to US consumers with minimal IOR accountability. The bill's proponents argue that the existing de minimis framework creates a regulatory gap that Chinese sellers exploit by shipping individually-wrapped consumer orders that individually fall below the USD 800 US de minimis threshold while collectively representing commercial import volumes that would face full customs scrutiny if shipped as consolidated commercial consignments.
The EU policy parallel is direct. The European Parliament's resolution on the reform of EU customs has specifically called for elimination or significant reduction of the EUR 150 de minimis threshold, with the European Commission's customs reform package proposing to remove the duty relief for goods sold through online platforms while maintaining it for genuine personal shipments — a distinction that the IOR accountability framework the US bill introduces would also enforce on the American side. Both legislative trajectories are responding to the same documented market distortion: the volume-at-scale use of individual consumer shipment exemptions that were designed for occasional personal imports, deployed as a systematic commercial import model by marketplace platforms whose aggregate shipment volumes dwarf the personal import use case the exemption was originally designed to accommodate.
The EU customs reform timeline is less advanced than the US legislative process — the European Parliament resolution requires Commission implementation measures before national enforcement changes — but the political direction is established and the implementation trajectory is toward restriction rather than expansion of de minimis relief. Planning import compliance for incoming EU customs reform models the cost impact of de minimis threshold reduction or elimination on sellers currently using direct-from-China low-value shipment models — calculating the additional duty and compliance cost that full commercial import procedures would add to their per-unit landed cost, and identifying the import restructuring options that minimise the cost impact of the transition from de minimis to full-duty import status.
Which EU Import Models Are Most Exposed to De Minimis Reform
The EU de minimis reform will not affect all import models equally. The exposure depends on whether the seller currently relies on the de minimis exemption as part of their import cost model — and most Amazon FBA sellers importing through a licensed German 3PL or customs broker do not, because commercial FBA import shipments arrive as consolidated commercial consignments that have always been subject to full customs clearance regardless of individual unit value. The sellers most exposed to de minimis reform are those using fulfilment-by-seller models where goods are shipped directly from Chinese warehouses to EU consumers as individual parcels below EUR 150 — a model that Amazon does not use for FBA inventory but that competitors using Temu, Shein, direct Aliexpress seller models, or WooCommerce/Shopify stores with Chinese dropship suppliers do rely on at scale.
The secondary exposure category covers Amazon sellers who use a hybrid model: FBA for their main inventory and direct-from-China dropship for slow-moving or new product test SKUs that they do not want to commit to FBA inventory. These hybrid sellers may be partially reliant on de minimis shipments for their non-FBA inventory, particularly for products priced below EUR 150 that they source directly from Chinese suppliers and ship individually to EU consumers without intermediate EU warehousing. For these sellers, de minimis reform adds the duty and compliance cost to the direct-from-China shipments that their FBA inventory already absorbs — eliminating the cost differential that made direct-from-China dropshipping cost-competitive for test SKUs relative to FBA-committed inventory.
Amazon sellers whose entire import model routes goods through a German or Polish 3PL as the EU importer of record — receiving commercial shipments in Germany, completing FBA prep, and forwarding to Amazon — are the least exposed to de minimis reform because their import model already operates at full customs compliance. For these sellers, de minimis reform is a competitive benefit rather than a cost: the Chinese marketplace sellers who have competed on price by routing individual consumer shipments through the de minimis exemption will face higher landed costs after reform, reducing the duty-avoidance cost advantage that has allowed Temu and Shein to undercut EU-compliant sellers on price. Competitive positioning through compliant EU import infrastructure supports the commercial argument that compliant import infrastructure is a competitive asset rather than a cost — particularly in the regulatory environment where the cost differential between compliant and non-compliant import models is narrowing as de minimis reform enforcement tightens the gap.
EU Customs Clearance Procedure Changes: What to Expect in Germany and France
Beyond de minimis threshold changes, the EU customs reform package introduces procedural changes to the customs clearance process that affect how low-value commercial shipments are declared and processed at German and French entry points — changes that will add documentation requirements, electronic data pre-notification obligations, and risk-based inspection triggers to shipment categories that currently benefit from simplified clearance procedures. Understanding these procedural changes in advance allows sellers to configure their import documentation workflows before the changes take effect rather than discovering the new requirements when a shipment is held at Hamburg or Frankfurt pending documentation that the new procedure mandates.
The EU's customs reform package proposes a new Trust and Check trader status that expands the existing Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) framework — creating a simplified clearance pathway for importers who meet the data quality, compliance history, and financial standing requirements that the status demands. For Amazon sellers using a German 3PL or customs broker with existing AEO status, the Trust and Check framework extends the AEO compliance benefits to a wider range of shipment types — potentially allowing pre-clearance release before physical arrival at the EU border for qualifying importers. Sellers whose 3PL partner does not hold AEO status will not benefit from the simplified clearance pathway and will face the standard clearance procedure for all shipment types, including the enhanced data pre-notification requirements that the reform package introduces for e-commerce parcels and low-value commercial shipments.
The IOSS (Import One Stop Shop) framework for VAT on low-value consignments — already operational since July 2021 — will be extended and enforcement tightened as part of the de minimis reform package. Sellers using IOSS to collect VAT at point of sale for direct-to-consumer EU shipments must ensure their IOSS registration is current, their IOSS number is correctly transmitted to customs at the point of electronic pre-notification, and their VAT reporting through IOSS accurately reflects the consignment volumes that customs data will be used to cross-check. Integrating IOSS and customs clearance workflows for EU imports maintains the IOSS transaction data and customs pre-notification alignment that enforcement tightening requires — ensuring that IOSS-reported sales match the customs entry data for the same consignments, which is the cross-check that EU customs authorities will increasingly apply as the de minimis reform enforcement infrastructure is built out.
Structuring Your EU Import Flows for the Post-De Minimis Environment
The import flow restructuring that the de minimis reform signals requires Amazon sellers to evaluate two questions: whether their current import model relies on de minimis exemptions in any part of the supply chain, and whether their customs compliance infrastructure — EORI registration, VAT registration, customs broker relationship, import documentation quality — meets the standards that the incoming regulatory environment will require from all commercial importers regardless of shipment value. For sellers who answer no to the first question and yes to the second, the de minimis reform requires no immediate operational change — their existing compliant import model is positioned correctly for the regulatory direction.
For sellers who currently use direct-from-China dropship for any SKU segment, the restructuring decision is whether to: transition the dropship SKUs to FBA inventory through a German 3PL, accepting the higher inventory carrying cost of EU-warehoused stock against the duty and compliance cost that de minimis closure adds to the direct-from-China model; continue dropship but implement full commercial import compliance for every consignment, absorbing the duty cost that de minimis reform adds and the documentation overhead of full customs clearance for individual consumer shipments; or discontinue the direct-from-China dropship SKUs entirely if the duty-inclusive landed cost makes them unprofitable at the consumer price point that the Chinese marketplace competition has established. Each option has different cost and complexity implications that depend on the specific product, price point, and demand volume — making the restructuring decision a product-level calculation rather than a uniform policy choice across the assortment.
The importer-of-record structure for EU imports deserves explicit review in the context of de minimis reform. The US bill's emphasis on IOR accountability — requiring a US-established entity to be legally responsible for compliance, duty, and product safety of every imported consignment — mirrors the direction that EU reform is taking: greater accountability for the entity that places goods into the EU market, and greater liability for customs brokers and 3PL partners who act as IOR without adequate due diligence on the goods they are clearing. Importer-of-record compliance for EU cross-border ecommerce structures the IOR relationship between seller, customs broker, and 3PL to meet the accountability requirements that EU reform is introducing — ensuring that the declaration accuracy, product safety documentation, and duty calculation responsibility are clearly assigned and documented before enforcement tightening exposes the IOR liability gaps that loosely structured import arrangements leave open.
Why a Licensed German Customs Broker Matters More as De Minimis Reform Approaches
The value of a licensed German customs broker in the post-de minimis environment increases for two distinct reasons: the documentation and compliance requirements that the reform introduces make declaration accuracy more consequential, and the IOR accountability framework that is developing internationally makes the customs broker's professional liability and regulated status a more important protection for sellers whose import volumes create meaningful customs debt exposure.
Declaration accuracy matters more as de minimis reform enforcement tightens because the cross-checking infrastructure that EU customs authorities are building — comparing IOSS sales data, electronic pre-notification data, and customs entry data for the same consignments — will identify inconsistencies between these data sources that the current low-scrutiny environment for de minimis shipments does not surface. Sellers who have been importing low-value goods with minimal customs documentation detail will face an enforcement environment where the same goods require the same documentation standard as high-value commercial shipments, and where the discrepancies between IOSS-reported values and customs-declared values that the cross-check identifies generate the post-clearance audits that document-light de minimis importers have not previously experienced.
The licensed German customs broker's professional liability and AEO status provide the documentation quality and compliance track record that the incoming enforcement environment rewards with lower inspection rates and faster clearance — the operational benefits that translate directly into inventory availability at Amazon's fulfillment centers on the timeline that FBA shipment planning requires. A customs broker without AEO status who is processing higher documentation volumes as de minimis reform increases the compliance burden for low-value shipments will face throughput pressure that degrades declaration quality at exactly the moment enforcement scrutiny is increasing. Customs clearance infrastructure for post-de minimis EU imports selects and manages the customs broker relationships that provide AEO-status clearance capability, documented classification accuracy, and the professional indemnity coverage that de minimis reform's enhanced IOR accountability framework demands from the import compliance infrastructure that Amazon sellers in Germany and France depend on for their cross-border supply chains.
The De Minimis Gap Is Narrowing Fast
The de minimis crackdown is not yet a done deal in the EU — the legislative process has further stages before enforcement changes reach German and French customs offices. But the political direction is clear enough and the US regulatory signal specific enough that Amazon sellers importing into Germany and France should treat the reform as an imminent operational reality rather than a speculative future risk. The sellers who will be least affected are those already operating with a compliant commercial import model through a licensed German customs broker: they are not reliant on de minimis exemptions, their IOR accountability structure is already defined, and their documentation quality meets the standards that the incoming enforcement environment will require from all commercial importers. The sellers who need to act are those using any de minimis-dependent import flow — direct-from-China dropship, hybrid FBA and dropship models, or low-value consignment shipping that has relied on simplified clearance procedures that the reform will replace with full commercial import compliance requirements.
FLEX Logistics provides the licensed customs clearance and EU import infrastructure that the post-de minimis environment requires: EORI and German VAT-registered import capability, AEO-status customs clearance through our German broker relationships, IOSS compliance data alignment, and the FBA prep and forwarding infrastructure that converts compliant EU import into available Amazon inventory — the full import-to-FBA service that Amazon sellers need as the de minimis gap closes and compliant import infrastructure becomes the baseline requirement rather than the competitive differentiator it is today.
Located in the center of Europe, FLEX Logistics provides licensed customs clearance, EU importer-of-record support, IOSS compliance, and FBA prep for Amazon sellers structuring their EU import flows for the post-de minimis regulatory environment in Germany and France.
Get in touch for a free quote and assessment tailored to your EU customs clearance and cross-border import compliance requirements.
