3PL vs. fulfillment by marketplace: what’s the difference?
17 February 2026
FDA & EU Regulations: Navigating the Logistics of Food and Drink Shipping
19 February 2026
OUR GOAL
To provide an A-to-Z e-commerce logistics solution that would complete Amazon fulfillment network in the European Union.
You know that feeling when you have sent a shipment to Europe and some days later you get an invoice for the shipping services...that's visibly higher than what you have paid earlier? There are several surcharges on the invoice that, without a warning or explanation, wipe out half your margin on a single order. And that’s when you start wondering: is this a mistake? A hidden rule you didn't know about? Or maybe a scam attempt?
The truth is actually much less dramatic - the culprit is often the package dimensions. Sometimes a parcel ends up in the wrong pricing category because of two or three extra centimeters in the box or because the shape isn’t “machine-friendly.” Or because one side is just a little longer than the carrier’s conveyor system would like. Since the European carriers process hundreds of thousands of parcels every day, the whole process is highly automated and standardized - and not forgiving when it comes to packaging mistakes, even if it's "just 2 centimeters."
Fortunately, a few packing adjustments can make the surcharges disappear just as quickly as they appeared on your invoice, so in this article, we'll show you why those surprise charges appear and how to make sure your product packaging meets carriers strict standards down to the millimeters.
Why parcel dimensions matter more than weight
In most non-European markets, shipping costs are anchored in kilograms. So when brands start sending products to the EU, they use the same mental model: check the weight, select a service, print the label, and pay according to the parcel weight. It feels logical—heavier should mean more expensive, right? But for European carriers, the real cost driver is space, not mass, since their entire network is built around automated conveyor systems that need parcels to fit predictable shapes and sizes. Anything that doesn’t fit that pattern becomes more expensive to process.
Every parcel entering a European network passes through automated tunnels equipped with laser or 3D scanners. These systems instantly capture three things:
– length, width, and height,
– shape and stability (irregular edges = problem),
– volume used on conveyors.
That volume measurement is exactly why a 1 kg item shipped in a 45 × 35 × 20 cm box may cost more than a 5 kg item in a 28 × 22 × 10 cm box - carriers estimate and monetize the space your parcel occupies in sorting facilities, trucks, and cargo containers. If your package is lightweight but the packing itself makes it look bulky, then the parcel reduces the number of parcels that fit in line-haul trailers and slows down conveyor throughput. And if a parcel is even slightly outside the carrier’s acceptable range, the system can’t move it through standard machinery. Instead, it must be diverted to a manual lane—which triggers a surcharge, often automatically.
And by saying "slightly outside the carrier’s acceptable range" we mean situations such as when your parcel is 121 cm long where the carrier’s limit is 120 cm, a box is slightly bowed out because of internal pressure, or one corner isn’t perfectly square. A human worker might not notice those differences, but for a machine, a 1 cm difference is enough to flag the parcel as needing manual handling.
What's more, anything that cannot lie flat, has protruding edges, or has an uneven shape is considered “non-conveyable,” and then the machine flags the packages for manual picking, scanning, and routing to the right place. That amount of manual work needed to process a non-standard package is why surcharges for “non-conveyable” shipments can be higher than the cost of the original shipping label.
How parcel pricing works in Europe: the mechanisms behind surcharges
European parcel pricing often looks simple at the quoting stage—a flat rate based on destination, weight, and service level. But the real price you pay is determined inside the carrier’s network by machines evaluating your shipment’s size, shape, and behavior on conveyors. These mechanisms operate automatically and without human intervention, which is why they expect all packages to match their standards and flag all parcels that are deviating from the requirements, even if only by a centimeter.
There are three main metrics that can drive surcharge costs: volumetric weight, dimensional thresholds, and machinability. Each of these can increase shipping costs on its own—and when they combine, costs rise much faster than many sellers anticipate.
1. Volumetric weight: how carriers price the space your parcel occupies
Volumetric weight exists because transport and sortation capacity are limited by volume, not kilograms, and every parcel that takes up unnecessary space reduces the number of shipments a carrier can load.
That's why every carrier calculates your parcel in the same way:
– first, they scan its dimensions (machine-based, without relying on the dimensions on the label),
– then they convert them to a dimensional weight,
– and then compare it with the actual weight.
Whichever is higher becomes the chargeable weight. This mechanism matters especially for lightweight goods (electronics accessories, apparel, and home goods), where the parcel’s volume determines 70–100% of the shipping cost. The thing is, many brands underestimate real post-packing dimensions and, for example, use multiple layers of paper and bubble wrap for packaging their product. Those layers obviously increase how much space the package will take inside the truck or plane though - a box that expands by 2–3 cm after filling can raise volumetric weight enough to push the shipment into a higher pricing tier.
What's even more confusing is that the divisor (4000–6000) differs by carrier. Because of this, the same parcel can produce very different volumetric weight values depending on who transports it. A box that calculates to 6 kg of volumetric weight with a divisor of 4000 may come out as only 4 kg with a divisor of 6000—which means it may fall into a higher pricing tier with one carrier but remain standard-priced with another.
2. Oversize tiers: how crossing a dimensional threshold shifts the parcel into a different cost category
European carriers also maintain extremely tight dimensional limits because automated conveyors and chutes are calibrated for parcels that fall within a standard size envelope. Once your parcel exceeds that envelope (even slightly), it no longer flows efficiently through the automated stream.
To handle such parcels, carriers create oversize tiers (Oversize 1, Oversize 2, etc.), each representing a higher level of disruption to automation. A parcel in Oversize 1 may still move through parts of the automated infrastructure but requires additional routing steps, slower belts, or manual checks at certain points. Oversize 2 usually means the parcel cannot move safely through key sections of the conveyor system at all and must be redirected to manual handling for larger segments of the journey. Because each higher tier consumes more labor, time, and space, the surcharge increases accordingly to reflect how much work processing the package took.
Different carriers also define dimensional limits in their own ways, which means the same parcel can fall into entirely different processing categories depending on the network. For example, a shipment that stays within the standard size limits of DHL may exceed the maximum-length threshold used by GLS, automatically placing it in an oversize tier in their system. Meanwhile, UPS might apply even stricter rules for long sides or combined girth, causing the same parcel to be classified as “large package”, with a surcharge several times higher than the base rate.
3. Non-conveyable items: when the parcel cannot safely move through automated systems
Non-conveyable classification is the carrier’s way of saying, “This parcel will break our machines, or our machines won’t handle it reliably.” Carriers define non-conveyables using dozens of criteria, but the underlying logic is consistent: if a parcel cannot be scanned, stabilized, or routed with 100% reliability, it must be processed manually.
What makes a parcel non-conveyable?
– Not a rigid, rectangular box (bags, tubes, cylinders, irregular packaging).
– Too soft or flexible to maintain shape under pressure.
– Has protruding elements, straps, handles, or uneven surfaces.
– Cannot lie flat or it tends to roll.
– Shape prevents accurate volumetric scanning.
– Too heavy, too light, or unstable for conveyor velocity.
– Risks jamming or damaging equipment.
Once a parcel gets flagged by the machine and pulled from the conveyor, it enters a manual workflow, which for obvious reasons is far more expensive than machine handling. The surcharge doesn’t just cover “inconvenience”; it covers a sequence of manual interventions the parcel will require at every hub it touches. This is why non-conveyable fees often sit at the very top of a carrier’s surcharge table.
4. Long-side surcharges: how a single dimension can reroute an entire shipment
European carriers also have strict rules for long parcels because long edges are a direct mechanical risk to the machine. A conveyor is designed to handle parcels that fall within a stable length-to-width ratio; anything with an excessive long side becomes unsafe or jams equipment.
Long-side surcharges can be triggered when:
– one side exceeds the carrier’s maximum (e.g., 120 cm),
– the second-longest side exceeds a secondary limit,
– or the parcel’s shape makes rotation impossible in automated tunnels.
The main problem here is that long parcels behave very differently inside a carrier’s network because their proportions don’t match the design of automated sortation lines. When a box is noticeably longer than it is wide, it becomes unstable on high-speed conveyors: it tends to swing, pivot, or drift sideways as the belt accelerates. That instability makes it difficult for the system to scan the parcel correctly or to push it into the right chute at the exact moment the diverter needs to activate.
Long parcels also can’t be stacked efficiently in trucks or containers, so they consume more line-haul space per shipment than their weight would justify. Many also require two people to lift or reposition them safely, especially when the parcel’s center of gravity doesn’t fall in the middle. All of this adds manual work, slows down operations, and reduces the overall capacity of the network, which is exactly why carriers attach surcharges to parcels that exceed long-side thresholds.
While each mechanism can independently increase costs, the real challenge for D2C brands is cumulative classification, as a parcel might be, at the same time:
- large enough to increase volumetric weight,
- slightly too long for standard automation,
- soft or uneven enough to be considered non-conveyable.
And then for each of those issues, the system will add a separate fee. So while it might look like the surcharges are added randomly, they are actually the cost of the additional manual work that was needed to process your parcel creates inside their infrastructure.
Practical examples: how a few extra centimeters turn into real surcharges
The easiest way to understand European surcharge logic is to see how it plays out in real shipments, so for a practical example, we'll use a U.S.-based cosmetics brand shipping a three-piece skincare set to customers in Europe. The products themselves are light and compact—but the packaging choices unintentionally caused the package handling and delivery to be classified as much more expensive than what the company estimated earlier. Let's assume here that the company paid 9 euros for shipping.
How extra bubble wrap increased the volumetric weight—and doubled the chargeable weight
The brand wanted to protect a set of three glass-jar face creams, and so the fulfillment team wrapped the bundle in three layers of bubble wrap, creating a thick, rounded shape. Once wrapped, the product no longer fit into the brand’s usual 24 × 18 × 10 cm shipping box. Instead, they switched to the next size up: 30 × 22 × 12 cm. The real weight of the set was only 0.8 kg, so the team expected the shipment to be billed at 1 kg.
But here’s what actually happened in Europe:
• Original planned box (24 × 18 × 10 cm):
Volume: 4,320 cm³
Volumetric weight (÷ 5000): 0.86 kg → charged as 1 kg
• New box required after bubble wrapping (30 × 22 × 12 cm):
Volume: 7,920 cm³
Volumetric weight (÷ 5000): 1.58 kg → charged as 2 kg
Despite the parcel being physically light, the volumetric weight nearly doubled, simply because the protective wrapping forced the product into a larger box.
The “slightly swollen box” effect — how 2–3 cm changed the parcel category
After packing, the bubble-wrapped set didn’t sit tightly inside the larger box. As the fulfillment team sealed the carton, the pressure from inside caused the top panel to bulge outward by 2–3 mm—which automated scanners later rounded up to 1–2 cm, as dimensional systems don’t measure perfect surfaces but projected bounding boxes. The final machine-validated dimensions were captured as 31 × 23 × 13 cm, not 30 × 22 × 12.
That tiny increase triggered two consequences:
A further increase in volumetric weight:
31 × 23 × 13 cm = 9,259 cm³
Volumetric weight: 1.85 kg → charged as 2 kg, but dangerously close to the next tier.A dimensional threshold breach with a carrier
An European carrier the cosmetic company asked to process and deliver the packages applies a surcharge when the second-longest side exceeds 22 cm. At 23 cm, the skin cream set parcel is automatically classified under a higher processing tier.
1cm difference between the accepted and oversized box is something that most carriers and warehouse workers probably wouldn't even notice when handling the packages, or if they did notice, they would attribute it to the bulged box. Sorting and processing machines, though, can measure the packages very precisely and for them, the 1 cm difference in size is enough to flag the parcel as belonging to a higher pricing tier.
How the rounded, cushioned shape triggered machinability issues
Because the skincare set was heavily wrapped, the shape inside the box wasn’t fully stable, and the top surface of the packed parcel bowed slightly, which made the box behave unpredictably on conveyors: it rocked and tilted when passing over high-speed belts, which caused the scanners to misread the box dimensions. Because of this, the parcel was flagged as non-conveyable and requiring manual handling, and the shipment incurred a manual-handling surcharge that was higher than the base shipping cost.
Now let’s put it all together:
• extra bubble wrap → forced a larger box → raised volumetric weight,
• bulging edges → increased measured dimensions → triggered a higher tier,
• unstable internal shape → interfered with scanners → flagged as non-conveyable.
None of these factors alone might have seemed like a significant issue, but inside a European automated hub, each one activated a separate surcharge fee:
- higher chargeable weight (1 kg → almost 2 kg),
- higher dimensional classification,
- a manual-handling surcharge.
What should have been a €9 cross-border shipment turned out to be three times as expensive, because the company assumed that extra packing wouldn't be a problem as long as the entire package itself was light.
Why no two carriers price the same parcel the same way?
One of the biggest surprises for non-European e-commerce sellers is that a parcel can move through one carrier’s network without any issues—and generate multiple surcharges in another. Dimensions are dimensions; shouldn't every carrier apply similar rules? Unfortunately, that's not how it works in Europe. The truth is that the automated infrastructure behind each network is built differently - and because operational realities differ, pricing logic differs too.
A parcel that flows smoothly through the automated tunnels of DHL may jam or destabilize machinery in the network of GLS simply because the belts, diverters, and conveyors have different widths or angle tolerances. Meanwhile, UPS may use a more restrictive dimensional scanner that rounds measurements up more aggressively.
No European carrier uses exactly the same cutoff points either:
• the maximum long side might be 120 cm for one carrier, 100 cm for another, and 97 cm for a third,
• the second-longest side may have its own separate threshold,
• girth limits are calculated differently depending on the network,
• some carriers apply surcharges at 1 mm over the limit, others allow a tolerance of 5–10 mm.
This means the exact same cosmetic shipment from the earlier example — say, sized 31 × 23 × 13 cm — could be fully standard for one carrier but oversized for the carrier that has 23 cm exceed their secondary dimension threshold. Add to this how each carrier defines and charges for irregular shapes and how volumetric weight divisor can differ wildly, and suddenly it makes much more sense why one carrier might accept the same package without issues while others add surcharges for extra work needed to process the packages.
The best solution here is simply to ask your carrier to give you a list of accepted package dimensions and surcharges cost for not meeting those standards, as based on the information from the carrier you can adjust the existing or build a new packaging process and quality checklist, which you can then use to examine the package before handing it to the carrier.
Time to cut off those surcharges from your invoices
When shipping to Europe, it's not the package's weight that can cost you the most - it's them not fitting well into the carriers' machines and processes. A bit too much bubble wrap, a box that bows out by a centimeter, a shape that’s just a little too soft… and the carrier’s system instantly pushes the parcel out of the automatic into into manual handling. It might be frustrating at the start because, from your side, nothing looks “wrong" but that's simply because the machines at the sorting and processing facilities are much more precise than us and have no way to process packages that do not fit their in-built standards.
The good news is that preparing packages that fit those standards isn't actually that hard. A couple of millimeters shaved off here, a sturdier internal fit there, measuring after sealing instead of before… and suddenly the parcel moves through Europe the way we expected from the start. And honestly, that’s the whole point: we don’t need perfection, we just need packaging that behaves predictably in a very predictable system.
And if you still have a few questions or doubts about how you can adjust your packaging processes so they would fit the carrier requirements perfectly, it might be a good time for a chat with us. At FLEX Logistics, we help brands clean up their packaging, prep shipments for Amazon FBA, and make sure everything stays within the thresholds that European carriers expect.
And if you’d like us to take a look at your current packaging and point out where those sneaky extra centimeters are coming from, we’re ready to talk - and give you a quick win for your margins.
